How a new generation of data interface is advancing the practice.
Several of PCO’s camera series like pco.edge and pco.dicam combine advanced sCMOS technology with an ultra-fast Camera Link HS (CLHS) interface. But what exactly is CLHS and what are its advantages over other data interfaces?
Interview: How does CLHS perform in practice?
These are some impressive facts. But how does CLHS perform in the field? Let’s have a look at LaVision, a company that can provide you the answer.
LaVision is a leading provider of innovative imaging laser measurement systems. The company’s standard systems as well as customer specified complete solutions are used in the fields of scientific and industrial optical metrology worldwide. LaVision is using pco.edge cameras with CLHS interfaces for PIV applications.
Mr. Uwe Dierksheide, product manager and responsible for PIV at LaVision, shared some insights with us on his company’s experience with this interface.
You are in the product management responsible for PIV systems at LaVision. Which data interfaces are you typically using in your applications? What technical requirements do the data interfaces need to meet?
“In addition to the particle generator a PIV system usually consists of cameras with optics, lighting and a computer control unit for synchronization, data storage and analysis. The performance of the overall system depends to a high degree on how good these components are tuned to each other.
Due to the development of higher resolutions and higher frame rates the requirements for data interfaces have risen dramatically within the last few years. While measuring the system often generates a huge amount of data in a very short time. This needs to be processed and stored as efficiently as possible. High-performing data interfaces with great reliability and high bandwidth are the key to the system’s overall efficiency.”
Which data interfaces do you currently use?
“At the moment we mainly use four types of data interface:
USB 3 is a cost-effective solution available on nearly all computers as a standard feature. It is suitable for middle bandwidths. The length for passive cables, however, is limited to just a few meters.
In addition to their network functionally we value Ethernet, especially 10GigE for their high bandwidth. The setup and operation of such a network with several cameras requires not only powerful individual components. Also a certain degree of system competence on the part of the users and administrators is necessary.
In our high-performing systems we currently use either Camera Link or PCI Express. The bandwidths are extremely high. But on the other hand the cable lengths are very limited. Fiber optic converters with fiber optic cable can increase transmittance distance. However, this will also result in a rise in system complexity and costs.”
Why will you be using CLHS in the future?
“From a technical point of view up to now the interface selection has always been a compromise between cable length and transmission rate. This compromise does not exist with the new CLHS. CLHS also meets our high reliability requirements. Thanks to the use of fiber optic cables EMV problems are a thing of the past. I would also like to point out the FEC which is integrated in the protocol. This additional security layer saves us from the worst case scenario: the loss of data.”
Aside from these technical arguments what is the profitability and cost efficiency of this new data interface?
“When comparing Camera Link with CLHS one would expect a higher price for CLHS due to its technical advantages. The truth is quite the opposite. The separate camera systems (camera, frame grabber and cable) are approximately the same price. However, we often have multi-camera setups with more than one camera per frame grabber and the omission of FOL converters in our applications. Therefore we are able to realize significant cost savings.
The CLHS hardware is based on standard components from the network technology. There’s a huge market internationally for these components, independent of imaging applications with many hardware manufacturers. For this reason I’m convinced that the CLHS technology will also be well positioned in the future.”
Where do you see CLHS in three years?
“We will continue to use USB 3 and GigE for a long time. Nevertheless, CLHS is now our first choice for powerful peer-to-peer interfaces. I am positive this technology will establish itself successfully in the imaging market within the next years and replace Camera Link.”